{"id":2593,"date":"2024-11-28T11:48:01","date_gmt":"2024-11-28T10:48:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/taoma-partners.fr\/en\/?p=2593"},"modified":"2024-11-28T14:18:42","modified_gmt":"2024-11-28T13:18:42","slug":"validity-of-the-use-of-nominees-before-the-french-office-when-inactive-trademarks-are-dethroned-by-ghost-lawyers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/taoma-partners.fr\/en\/2024\/11\/28\/validity-of-the-use-of-nominees-before-the-french-office-when-inactive-trademarks-are-dethroned-by-ghost-lawyers\/","title":{"rendered":"Validity of the use of nominees before the French Office: when inactive trademarks are dethroned by ghost lawyers"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On <span style=\"color: #963764;\">18 September 2024<\/span>, the Paris Court of Appeal handed down a ruling upholding the decision of the Director General of the <span style=\"color: #6f2f90;\">French Industrial Property Office (INPI)<\/span> declaring the Trademark BASTILLE No. 144101016 cancelled for <span style=\"color: #1d6e81;\">non-use<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>This decision is part of a <span style=\"color: #963764;\">post-2019<\/span> reform context, which has opened the possibility of cancellation actions for non-use before <span style=\"color: #6f2f90;\">the INPI<\/span>. In the present case, the cancellation action had been filed via a lawyer acting as <span style=\"color: #1d6e81;\">nominee<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>This practice can be of considerable interest to clients wishing to remain anonymous in their actions against third parties or competitors.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">Validation <b><span lang=\"EN-US\">by the Court of Appeal of a nominee as plaintiff of a cancellation action for non-use<\/span><\/b><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The trademark in question, registered in <span style=\"color: #963764;\">2014<\/span>, designated, among other things, goods in Class 16, such as printing products and newspapers. However, an application for cancellation action for <span style=\"color: #1d6e81;\">non-use <\/span>has been filed with success.<\/p>\n<p>The owner of the trademark challenged before the <span style=\"color: #6f2f90;\">Paris Court of Appeal<\/span> the decision issued by the Office, putting forward two arguments.<\/p>\n<p>Firstly, he alleged malice by accusing the plaintiff in the cancellation action of acting on behalf of his former partner. Secondly, he claimed the existence of proper reasons for non-use, linked to copyright disputes concerning a magazine entitled <em>BASTILLE<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>In response, the <span style=\"color: #6f2f90;\">Court<\/span> upheld the <span style=\"color: #6f2f90;\">INPI<\/span>&#8216;s initial decision, rejecting the owner&#8217;s arguments.<\/p>\n<p>The <span style=\"color: #6f2f90;\">Court of Appeal<\/span> pointed out that <span style=\"color: #1d6e81;\">the law does not require proof of a personal interest to bring a cancellation action for non-use before the INPI<\/span>. Justifying itself on the grounds of general interest, it inferred from the provisions of the Intellectual Property Code that <em>&#8220;the law grants very broadly the right to bring a cancellation action of a trademark for failure to use it before the Director General of the INPI to any natural or legal person who is granted, regardless of their status and without having to prove a personal interest, the right to exercise this right&#8221;.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>The <span style=\"color: #6f2f90;\">Court<\/span>\u00a0upheld the <span style=\"color: #1d6e81;\">strategy of using a nominee lawyer to file the application<\/span>, stressing that this &#8220;straw man&#8221; practice, although frequently used, particularly before <span style=\"color: #6f2f90;\">the EUIPO<\/span>, is not abusive.<\/p>\n<p>This decision legitimizes the use of nominees to bring trademark cancellation actions for non-use. It therefore makes it possible to <span style=\"color: #1d6e81;\">better guarantee free competition<\/span> by broadening the scope for action against unused trademarks.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">Reminder of the &#8220;proper reasons for non-use&#8221; concept<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The <span style=\"color: #6f2f90;\">Court<\/span> also recalled that copyright and trademark rights are independent. While copyright disputes may have arisen over the <em>BASTILLE<\/em> magazine, they did not prevent the owner from using its trademark for other products or services covered by its registration.<\/p>\n<p>The owner of the BASTILLE trademark, who didn\u2019t prove any use of the said mark between <span style=\"color: #963764;\">2016<\/span> and <span style=\"color: #963764;\">2021<\/span>, nor justify any proper reasons for such non-use, faced confirmation of the cancellation action of its trademark.<\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"color: #000080;\">Conclusion<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Although there is nothing in French law to prohibit cancellation actions for non-use filed by a nominee, and this practice has long been used before the EUIPO, this decision of the <span style=\"color: #6f2f90;\">Paris Court of Appeal<\/span> is the first to validate the practice of a nominee. In future, in France, we will be able to allow our clients to retain their anonymity, when this proves strategic, in order to defend their rights.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Jean-Charles NICOLLET<br \/>\n<\/strong><em>European Trademark &amp; Design Attorney \u2013 Partner<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>Malaurie Pantalacci<\/strong><br \/>\n<em>European Trademark &amp; Design Attorney \u2013 Partner<\/em><\/p>\n<p>1) Paris Court of Appeal, P\u00f4le 5 &#8211; Chamber 1, September 18th, 2024, no. 23\/04582<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On 18 September 2024, the Paris Court of Appeal handed down a ruling upholding the decision of the Director General of the French Industrial Property Office (INPI) declaring the Trademark BASTILLE No. 144101016 cancelled for non-use. This decision is part of a post-2019 reform context, which has opened the possibility of cancellation actions for non-use [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":2594,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[20,61,39],"tags":[99,63,102,101,100],"class_list":["post-2593","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-copyright","category-proceedings","category-trademarks","tag-bastille","tag-inpi","tag-lapse-date","tag-procedure","tag-strawmen"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Validity of the use of nominees before the French Office: when inactive trademarks are dethroned by ghost lawyers - TAoMA Partners EN<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/taoma-partners.fr\/en\/2024\/11\/28\/validity-of-the-use-of-nominees-before-the-french-office-when-inactive-trademarks-are-dethroned-by-ghost-lawyers\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Validity of the use of nominees before the French Office: when inactive trademarks are dethroned by ghost lawyers - TAoMA Partners EN\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"On 18 September 2024, the Paris Court of Appeal handed down a ruling upholding the decision of the Director General of the French Industrial Property Office (INPI) declaring the Trademark BASTILLE No. 144101016 cancelled for non-use. This decision is part of a post-2019 reform context, which has opened the possibility of cancellation actions for non-use [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/taoma-partners.fr\/en\/2024\/11\/28\/validity-of-the-use-of-nominees-before-the-french-office-when-inactive-trademarks-are-dethroned-by-ghost-lawyers\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"TAoMA Partners EN\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-11-28T10:48:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-11-28T13:18:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/taoma-partners.fr\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2024\/11\/lidia.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"800\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"TAoMA\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"TAoMA\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/taoma-partners.fr\\\/en\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/28\\\/validity-of-the-use-of-nominees-before-the-french-office-when-inactive-trademarks-are-dethroned-by-ghost-lawyers\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/taoma-partners.fr\\\/en\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/28\\\/validity-of-the-use-of-nominees-before-the-french-office-when-inactive-trademarks-are-dethroned-by-ghost-lawyers\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"TAoMA\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/taoma-partners.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/b67328600032ba3dd54cf1ded3435278\"},\"headline\":\"Validity of the use of nominees before the French Office: when inactive trademarks are dethroned by ghost lawyers\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-11-28T10:48:01+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-11-28T13:18:42+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/taoma-partners.fr\\\/en\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/28\\\/validity-of-the-use-of-nominees-before-the-french-office-when-inactive-trademarks-are-dethroned-by-ghost-lawyers\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":578,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/taoma-partners.fr\\\/en\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/28\\\/validity-of-the-use-of-nominees-before-the-french-office-when-inactive-trademarks-are-dethroned-by-ghost-lawyers\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/taoma-partners.fr\\\/en\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/2\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/lidia.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Bastille\",\"INPI\",\"Lapse date\",\"Procedure\",\"Strawmen\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Copyright\",\"Proceedings\",\"Trademarks\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/taoma-partners.fr\\\/en\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/28\\\/validity-of-the-use-of-nominees-before-the-french-office-when-inactive-trademarks-are-dethroned-by-ghost-lawyers\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/taoma-partners.fr\\\/en\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/28\\\/validity-of-the-use-of-nominees-before-the-french-office-when-inactive-trademarks-are-dethroned-by-ghost-lawyers\\\/\",\"name\":\"Validity of the use of nominees before the French Office: when inactive trademarks are dethroned by ghost lawyers - TAoMA Partners EN\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/taoma-partners.fr\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/taoma-partners.fr\\\/en\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/28\\\/validity-of-the-use-of-nominees-before-the-french-office-when-inactive-trademarks-are-dethroned-by-ghost-lawyers\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/taoma-partners.fr\\\/en\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/28\\\/validity-of-the-use-of-nominees-before-the-french-office-when-inactive-trademarks-are-dethroned-by-ghost-lawyers\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/taoma-partners.fr\\\/en\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/2\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/lidia.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-11-28T10:48:01+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-11-28T13:18:42+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/taoma-partners.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/b67328600032ba3dd54cf1ded3435278\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/taoma-partners.fr\\\/en\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/28\\\/validity-of-the-use-of-nominees-before-the-french-office-when-inactive-trademarks-are-dethroned-by-ghost-lawyers\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/taoma-partners.fr\\\/en\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/28\\\/validity-of-the-use-of-nominees-before-the-french-office-when-inactive-trademarks-are-dethroned-by-ghost-lawyers\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/taoma-partners.fr\\\/en\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/28\\\/validity-of-the-use-of-nominees-before-the-french-office-when-inactive-trademarks-are-dethroned-by-ghost-lawyers\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/taoma-partners.fr\\\/en\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/2\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/lidia.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/taoma-partners.fr\\\/en\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/2\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/lidia.jpg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":800},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/taoma-partners.fr\\\/en\\\/2024\\\/11\\\/28\\\/validity-of-the-use-of-nominees-before-the-french-office-when-inactive-trademarks-are-dethroned-by-ghost-lawyers\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Accueil\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/taoma-partners.fr\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Validity of the use of nominees before the French Office: when inactive trademarks are dethroned by ghost lawyers\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/taoma-partners.fr\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/taoma-partners.fr\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"TAoMA Partners EN\",\"description\":\"TAoMA Partners EN\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/taoma-partners.fr\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/taoma-partners.fr\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/b67328600032ba3dd54cf1ded3435278\",\"name\":\"TAoMA\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/85f71256c4710d707e4b698b3b804ce8e2f0b784b59af41d4da67373b81658c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/85f71256c4710d707e4b698b3b804ce8e2f0b784b59af41d4da67373b81658c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/85f71256c4710d707e4b698b3b804ce8e2f0b784b59af41d4da67373b81658c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"TAoMA\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/taoma-partners.fr\\\/en\\\/author\\\/admingih092115\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Validity of the use of nominees before the French Office: when inactive trademarks are dethroned by ghost lawyers - TAoMA Partners EN","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/taoma-partners.fr\/en\/2024\/11\/28\/validity-of-the-use-of-nominees-before-the-french-office-when-inactive-trademarks-are-dethroned-by-ghost-lawyers\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Validity of the use of nominees before the French Office: when inactive trademarks are dethroned by ghost lawyers - TAoMA Partners EN","og_description":"On 18 September 2024, the Paris Court of Appeal handed down a ruling upholding the decision of the Director General of the French Industrial Property Office (INPI) declaring the Trademark BASTILLE No. 144101016 cancelled for non-use. This decision is part of a post-2019 reform context, which has opened the possibility of cancellation actions for non-use [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/taoma-partners.fr\/en\/2024\/11\/28\/validity-of-the-use-of-nominees-before-the-french-office-when-inactive-trademarks-are-dethroned-by-ghost-lawyers\/","og_site_name":"TAoMA Partners EN","article_published_time":"2024-11-28T10:48:01+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-11-28T13:18:42+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":800,"url":"https:\/\/taoma-partners.fr\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2024\/11\/lidia.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"TAoMA","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"TAoMA","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/taoma-partners.fr\/en\/2024\/11\/28\/validity-of-the-use-of-nominees-before-the-french-office-when-inactive-trademarks-are-dethroned-by-ghost-lawyers\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/taoma-partners.fr\/en\/2024\/11\/28\/validity-of-the-use-of-nominees-before-the-french-office-when-inactive-trademarks-are-dethroned-by-ghost-lawyers\/"},"author":{"name":"TAoMA","@id":"https:\/\/taoma-partners.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/b67328600032ba3dd54cf1ded3435278"},"headline":"Validity of the use of nominees before the French Office: when inactive trademarks are dethroned by ghost lawyers","datePublished":"2024-11-28T10:48:01+00:00","dateModified":"2024-11-28T13:18:42+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/taoma-partners.fr\/en\/2024\/11\/28\/validity-of-the-use-of-nominees-before-the-french-office-when-inactive-trademarks-are-dethroned-by-ghost-lawyers\/"},"wordCount":578,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/taoma-partners.fr\/en\/2024\/11\/28\/validity-of-the-use-of-nominees-before-the-french-office-when-inactive-trademarks-are-dethroned-by-ghost-lawyers\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/taoma-partners.fr\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2024\/11\/lidia.jpg","keywords":["Bastille","INPI","Lapse date","Procedure","Strawmen"],"articleSection":["Copyright","Proceedings","Trademarks"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/taoma-partners.fr\/en\/2024\/11\/28\/validity-of-the-use-of-nominees-before-the-french-office-when-inactive-trademarks-are-dethroned-by-ghost-lawyers\/","url":"https:\/\/taoma-partners.fr\/en\/2024\/11\/28\/validity-of-the-use-of-nominees-before-the-french-office-when-inactive-trademarks-are-dethroned-by-ghost-lawyers\/","name":"Validity of the use of nominees before the French Office: when inactive trademarks are dethroned by ghost lawyers - TAoMA Partners EN","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/taoma-partners.fr\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/taoma-partners.fr\/en\/2024\/11\/28\/validity-of-the-use-of-nominees-before-the-french-office-when-inactive-trademarks-are-dethroned-by-ghost-lawyers\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/taoma-partners.fr\/en\/2024\/11\/28\/validity-of-the-use-of-nominees-before-the-french-office-when-inactive-trademarks-are-dethroned-by-ghost-lawyers\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/taoma-partners.fr\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2024\/11\/lidia.jpg","datePublished":"2024-11-28T10:48:01+00:00","dateModified":"2024-11-28T13:18:42+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/taoma-partners.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/b67328600032ba3dd54cf1ded3435278"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/taoma-partners.fr\/en\/2024\/11\/28\/validity-of-the-use-of-nominees-before-the-french-office-when-inactive-trademarks-are-dethroned-by-ghost-lawyers\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/taoma-partners.fr\/en\/2024\/11\/28\/validity-of-the-use-of-nominees-before-the-french-office-when-inactive-trademarks-are-dethroned-by-ghost-lawyers\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/taoma-partners.fr\/en\/2024\/11\/28\/validity-of-the-use-of-nominees-before-the-french-office-when-inactive-trademarks-are-dethroned-by-ghost-lawyers\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/taoma-partners.fr\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2024\/11\/lidia.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/taoma-partners.fr\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2024\/11\/lidia.jpg","width":1200,"height":800},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/taoma-partners.fr\/en\/2024\/11\/28\/validity-of-the-use-of-nominees-before-the-french-office-when-inactive-trademarks-are-dethroned-by-ghost-lawyers\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Accueil","item":"https:\/\/taoma-partners.fr\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Validity of the use of nominees before the French Office: when inactive trademarks are dethroned by ghost lawyers"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/taoma-partners.fr\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/taoma-partners.fr\/en\/","name":"TAoMA Partners EN","description":"TAoMA Partners EN","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/taoma-partners.fr\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/taoma-partners.fr\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/b67328600032ba3dd54cf1ded3435278","name":"TAoMA","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/85f71256c4710d707e4b698b3b804ce8e2f0b784b59af41d4da67373b81658c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/85f71256c4710d707e4b698b3b804ce8e2f0b784b59af41d4da67373b81658c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/85f71256c4710d707e4b698b3b804ce8e2f0b784b59af41d4da67373b81658c9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"TAoMA"},"url":"https:\/\/taoma-partners.fr\/en\/author\/admingih092115\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/taoma-partners.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2593","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/taoma-partners.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/taoma-partners.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/taoma-partners.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/taoma-partners.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2593"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"https:\/\/taoma-partners.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2593\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2607,"href":"https:\/\/taoma-partners.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2593\/revisions\/2607"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/taoma-partners.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2594"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/taoma-partners.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2593"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/taoma-partners.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2593"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/taoma-partners.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2593"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}